Tailor Made

|| GEO GEO DETROIT ||

April 20, 2012 at 12:02pm
Home
Reblogged from paxamericana
paxamericana:

Mitt Romney and Bain Capital Represent Everything You Hate About Capitalism
James Sanderson had encountered a rare moment of industrial harmony. It was the early 1990s, and the 750 men and women at Georgetown Steel were pumping out wire rods at peak performance. They had an abiding trust in management’s ability to run a smart company. That allegiance was rewarded with fat profit-sharing checks. In the basement-wage economy of Georgetown, South Carolina, Sanderson and his coworkers were blue-collar aristocracy.
“We were doing very good,” says Sanderson, president of Steelworkers Local 7898. “The plant was making money, and we had good profit-sharing checks, and everything was going well.”
What he didn’t know was that it was about to end. Hundreds of miles to the north, in Boston, a future presidential candidate was sizing up Georgetown’s books.
Mitt Romney had been running Bain Capitalsince 1984, minting a reputation as a prince of private investment. A future prospectus byDeutsche Bank would reveal that by the time Romney left in 1999, Bain had averaged a shimmering 88 percent annual return. Romney would use that success to launch his political career.
His specialty was flipping companies — or what he often calls “creative destruction.” It’s the age-old theory that the new must constantly attack the old to bring efficiency to the economy, even if some are destroyed along the way. In other words, people like Romney are the wolves, culling the herd of the weak and infirm.
His formula was simple: Bain would purchase a firm with little money down, then begin extracting huge management fees and paying Romney and his investors enormous dividends.
The result was that previously profitable companies were now burdened with debt. But much like the Enron boys, Romney’s battery of MBAs fancied themselves the smartest guys in the room. It didn’t matter if a company manufactured bicycles or contact lenses; they were certain they could run it better than anyone else.
Bain would slash costs, jettison workers, reposition product lines, and merge its new companies with other firms. With luck, they’d be able to dump the firm in a few years for millions more than they’d paid for it.
But the beauty of Romney’s thesis was that it really didn’t matter if the company succeeded. Since he was yanking out cash early and often, he would profit even if his targets collapsed.
Which was precisely the fate awaiting Georgetown Steel.
When Bain purchased the mill, Sanderson says, change was immediate. Equipment upgrades stopped. Maintenance became an afterthought. Managers were replaced by people who knew nothing of steel. The union’s profit-sharing plan was sliced twice in the first year — then whacked altogether.
(Read more at the link above)

paxamericana:

Mitt Romney and Bain Capital Represent Everything You Hate About Capitalism

James Sanderson had encountered a rare moment of industrial harmony. It was the early 1990s, and the 750 men and women at Georgetown Steel were pumping out wire rods at peak performance. They had an abiding trust in management’s ability to run a smart company. That allegiance was rewarded with fat profit-sharing checks. In the basement-wage economy of Georgetown, South Carolina, Sanderson and his coworkers were blue-collar aristocracy.

“We were doing very good,” says Sanderson, president of Steelworkers Local 7898. “The plant was making money, and we had good profit-sharing checks, and everything was going well.”

What he didn’t know was that it was about to end. Hundreds of miles to the north, in Boston, a future presidential candidate was sizing up Georgetown’s books.

Mitt Romney had been running Bain Capitalsince 1984, minting a reputation as a prince of private investment. A future prospectus byDeutsche Bank would reveal that by the time Romney left in 1999, Bain had averaged a shimmering 88 percent annual return. Romney would use that success to launch his political career.

His specialty was flipping companies — or what he often calls “creative destruction.” It’s the age-old theory that the new must constantly attack the old to bring efficiency to the economy, even if some are destroyed along the way. In other words, people like Romney are the wolves, culling the herd of the weak and infirm.

His formula was simple: Bain would purchase a firm with little money down, then begin extracting huge management fees and paying Romney and his investors enormous dividends.

The result was that previously profitable companies were now burdened with debt. But much like the Enron boys, Romney’s battery of MBAs fancied themselves the smartest guys in the room. It didn’t matter if a company manufactured bicycles or contact lenses; they were certain they could run it better than anyone else.

Bain would slash costs, jettison workers, reposition product lines, and merge its new companies with other firms. With luck, they’d be able to dump the firm in a few years for millions more than they’d paid for it.

But the beauty of Romney’s thesis was that it really didn’t matter if the company succeeded. Since he was yanking out cash early and often, he would profit even if his targets collapsed.

Which was precisely the fate awaiting Georgetown Steel.

When Bain purchased the mill, Sanderson says, change was immediate. Equipment upgrades stopped. Maintenance became an afterthought. Managers were replaced by people who knew nothing of steel. The union’s profit-sharing plan was sliced twice in the first year — then whacked altogether.

(Read more at the link above)

(via socialistscum-deactivated201209)

Notes

  1. 6dogs9cats reblogged this from paxamericana
  2. dragamyr reblogged this from truth-has-a-liberal-bias
  3. deepseafission reblogged this from truth-has-a-liberal-bias
  4. overratedunderwhelmed reblogged this from truth-has-a-liberal-bias and added:
    In case anyone was wondering how Mitt Romney REALLY “earned” his $200 million.
  5. truth-has-a-liberal-bias reblogged this from paxamericana
  6. introvertedart reblogged this from reagan-was-a-horrible-president
  7. iamnineonefour reblogged this from reagan-was-a-horrible-president and added:
    Look, some well-known parasites.
  8. istellar reblogged this from reagan-was-a-horrible-president
  9. chipmunksback reblogged this from reagan-was-a-horrible-president
  10. ezelrod reblogged this from reagan-was-a-horrible-president
  11. jayaprada reblogged this from reagan-was-a-horrible-president
  12. schrodingers-cat-is-dead reblogged this from reagan-was-a-horrible-president
  13. reagan-was-a-horrible-president reblogged this from paxamericana
  14. bitcoitus reblogged this from proletarianinstinct and added:
    From SF Weekly. I actually already read the print version…on paper…you’ve probably never heard of it…
  15. clockworkesper reblogged this from paxamericana
  16. corporationindustry reblogged this from proletarianinstinct
  17. paxamericana posted this